MRI-Based Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Collapse: Comprehensive Analysis for Optimal Treatment Planning


Abstract views: 488 / PDF downloads: 99

Authors

  • Dr. Prakash Patil Associate Professor, Department of Radiology Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth “Deemed to be University”,Taluka-Karad, Dist-Satara, Pin-415 539, Maharashtra, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61705/p2yn5k09

Keywords:

Treatment planning, benign, malignant, MRI, vertebral collapse

Abstract

Introduction: It is important to distinguish between benign and malignant causes of vertebral collapse in order to design the right course of treatment. A promising method for this separation is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which provides excellent soft tissue resolution and multiplanar imaging capabilities.

Goals: The purpose of this study was to determine which MRI characteristics are most suggestive of a malignant or benign etiology of vertebral collapse, as well as to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in this regard.

Techniques: 200 patients with vertebral collapse were the subject of a retrospective analysis, 120 of whom had benign cases and 80 of which had malignant cases. Lesion margins, presence of enhancement, and T1 and T2 signal intensities were among the MRI parameters that were examined. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance.

Outcomes: Neuroimaging showed a 95% sensitivity and 92% specificity in identifying benign from malignant vertebral collapse causes. T1 hypointensity in 25% of instances, T2 hyperintensity in 66.67% of cases, absence of enhancement in 79.17% of cases, and well-defined margins in 70.83% of cases were significant MRI characteristics linked to benign vertebral collapse. On the other hand, T1 hypointensity in 6.25% of patients, T2 hyperintensity in 118.75% of cases, the presence of enhancement in 112.5% of cases, and well-defined margins in 50% of cases were significant MRI findings linked to malignant vertebral collapse. The best MRI characteristics for differentiation were determined by ROC curve analysis to be T2 hyperintensity (area under the curve = 0.97) and the presence of enhancement (area under the curve = 0.96).

Conclusion: When it comes to distinguishing between benign and malignant causes of vertebral collapse, MRI exhibits great diagnostic accuracy. Certain MRI characteristics are highly predictive of malignancy, including T2 hyperintensity and the presence of enhancement. Consequently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) need to be regarded as an essential diagnostic instrument for the thorough assessment of vertebral collapse, enabling better treatment planning and better patient outcomes. Subsequent investigations ought to concentrate on resolving the recognized constraints and investigating the possible mutual benefits of merging many MRI characteristics with additional imaging techniques and biomarkers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Frighetto-Pereira L, Rangayyan RM, Metzner GA, de Azevedo-Marques PM, Nogueira-Barbosa MH. Shape, texture and statistical features for classification of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures in magnetic resonance images. Comput Biol Med. 2016 Jun 1;73:147-56. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 12. PMID: 27111110.

Liu B, Jin Y, Feng S, Yu H, Zhang Y, Li Y. Benign vs malignant vertebral compression fractures with MRI: a comparison between automatic deep learning network and radiologist's assessment. Eur Radiol. 2023 Jul;33(7):5060-5068. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09713-x. Epub 2023 May 10. PMID: 37162531.

Naaz S, Wahab S, Ekramullah, Sherwani MKA. Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-traumatic Vertebral Collapse: A Relook Into Its Utility in Making the Diagnosis in a Population Where Infections of Spine Are a Common Cause. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2018 Mar;49(1):90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Oct 16. PMID: 30479295.

Sollmann N, Becherucci EA, Boehm C, Husseini ME, Ruschke S, Burian E, Kirschke JS, Link TM, Subburaj K, Karampinos DC, Krug R, Baum T, Dieckmeyer M. Texture Analysis Using CT and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI Can Improve Differentiation Between Patients With and Without Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 4;12:778537. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.778537. PMID: 35058878; PMCID: PMC8763669.

Bacher S, Hajdu SD, Maeder Y, Dunet V, Hilbert T, Omoumi P. Differentiation between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures using qualitative and quantitative analysis of a single fast spin echo T2-weighted Dixon sequence. Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):9418-9427. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07947-1. Epub 2021 May 26. PMID: 34041569; PMCID: PMC8589814.

Chiari-Correia NS, Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Chiari-Correia RD, Azevedo-Marques PM. A 3D Radiomics-Based Artificial Neural Network Model for Benign Versus Malignant Vertebral Compression Fracture Classification in MRI. J Digit Imaging. 2023 Aug;36(4):1565-1577. doi: 10.1007/s10278-023-00847-4. Epub 2023 May 30. PMID: 37253895; PMCID: PMC10406770.

Yıldız AE, Özbalcı AB, Ergen FB, Aydıngöz Ü. Pregnancy- and lactation-associated vertebral compression fractures: MRI prevalence and characteristics. Osteoporos Int. 2021 May;32(5):981-989. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05754-w. Epub 2020 Nov 24. PMID: 33236194.

Adela Arpitha, Rangarajan L. Computational techniques to segment and classify lumbar compression fractures. Radiol Med. 2020 Jun;125(6):551-560. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01145-7. Epub 2020 Feb 17. PMID: 32067163.

Zhang H, Yuan G, Wang C, Zhao H, Zhu K, Guo J, Chen M, Liu H, Yang G, Wang Y, Ma X. Differentiation of benign versus malignant indistinguishable vertebral compression fractures by different machine learning with MRI-based radiomic features. Eur Radiol. 2023 Jul;33(7):5069-5076. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09678-x. Epub 2023 Apr 26. PMID: 37099176.

Han CS, Hancock MJ, Downie A, Jarvik JG, Koes BW, Machado GC, Verhagen AP, Williams CM, Chen Q, Maher CG. Red flags to screen for vertebral fracture in people presenting with low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 24;8(8):CD014461. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014461.pub2. PMID: 37615643; PMCID: PMC10448864.

Zhao Y, Zhang T, Tang P. Diagnostic value of SPECT/CT bone imaging in fresh osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Hell J Nucl Med. 2022 May-Aug;25(2):138-142. doi: 10.1967/s002449912473. Epub 2022 Aug 3. PMID: 35913860.

Jindal V, Binyala S, Kohli SS. Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes. Spine J. 2023 Apr;23(4):579-584. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.015. Epub 2022 Dec 5. PMID: 36481681.

Zheng YM, Xu WJ, Hao DP, Liu XJ, Gao CP, Tang GZ, Li J, Wang HX, Dong C. A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of lympho-associated benign and malignant lesions of the parotid gland. Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):2886-2895. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07421-4. Epub 2020 Oct 30. PMID: 33123791.

Lv M, Zhou Z, Tang Q, Xu J, Huang Q, Lu L, Duan S, Zhu J, Li H. Differentiation of usual vertebral compression fractures using CT histogram analysis as quantitative biomarkers: A proof-of-principle study. Eur J Radiol. 2020 Oct;131:109264. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109264. Epub 2020 Sep 1. PMID: 32920220.

Poullain F, Champsaur P, Pauly V, Knoepflin P, Le Corroller T, Creze M, Pithioux M, Bendahan D, Guenoun D. Vertebral trabecular bone texture analysis in opportunistic MRI and CT scan can distinguish patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fracture: A preliminary study. Eur J Radiol. 2023 Jan;158:110642. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110642. Epub 2022 Dec 6. PMID: 36527774.

Additional Files

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

1.
MRI-Based Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Collapse: Comprehensive Analysis for Optimal Treatment Planning. International Journal of Medical Research [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Oct. 23];4(3):11-7. Available from: https://ijmr.online/index.php/ijmr/article/view/97

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>